我在一點一滴地死去：溫尼考特對虛假、毀壞、性以及死亡的看法

       人們總是誤解溫尼考特，以為他如詩般的文章只談愛與自由，以為他只會歌頌光明，不敢面對黑暗；以為他只關心母親和嬰孩，忽略父親與性特質。

       然而，他之所以如此貼近母嬰，是因為對男性與女性元素的洞見；之所以能踫觸殘酷的真相，是因為有著大無畏的溫柔；而他的作品之所以扣人心弦，是因為他對死亡的凝視直通生命的深處。

本課程透過溫尼考特的視野，去凝視各種型式的死亡，以及從那裡面源源不絕湧出的力量。

ž  D.W. Winnicott (1960) Ego Distortion in Terms of True and False Self. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. London: Karnac Books.

ž  Dodi Goldman (2010). Vital sparks and the form of things unknown. In Jan Abram 2013. (eds.) Donald Winnicott Today. New York: Routledge.

ž  Zeljko Loparic (2010). From Freud to Winnicott: aspects of a paradigm change. In Jan Abram 2013. (eds.) Donald Winnicott Today. New York: Routledge. 

ž  René Roussillon (2010). Winnicott’s deconstruction of primary narcissism. In Jan Abram 2013. (eds.) Donald Winnicott Today. New York: Routledge. 

[10/17]

ž  André Green (1973). The dead mother. In On Private Madness. Madison, CT: International University Press. Pp. 142-173.

ž  Christopher Bollas (1999). Dead mother, dead child. In The Dead Mother: The Work of André Green.London: Routledge.

[10/24]

ž  Ogden, T.H. (1995). Analyzing forms of aliveness and deadness of the transference-countertransference.IJPA76:695-709

ž  Parsons, M. (1999). The Logic of Play in Psychoanalysis. IJPA80:871-884

[10/31]

žAndré Green(1997). The intuition of the negative in Playing and Reality. IJPA78:1071-1084

žAndré Green (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting - in memory of D. W. Winnicott. IJPA56:1-22

žAndré Green (2010). Sources and vicissitudes of being in D. W. Winnicott's work. Psychoanal Q., 79:11-35.

[11/7]

žMarion Milner (2010). Winnicott: overlapping circles and the two way journey. In Jan Abram 2013. (eds.) Donald Winnicott Today. New York: Routledge. 

žThomas Ogden (2004). On holding and containing, being and dreaming. IJPA85(6):1349-1364

žParsons, M. (2007). Raiding the inarticulate: the internal analytic setting and listening beyond countertransference. IJPA88:1441-1456

[11/14]

žJan Abram (2010). DWW’s notes for the Vienna Congress 1971. In Jan Abram 2013. (eds.) Donald Winnicott Today. New York: Routledge..

Coline Covington (2017). Evil and destructiveness: a psychoanalytic view. In Everyday Evils: A Psychoanalytic View of Evil and Morality. New York: Routledge.

[11/21]

žChristopher Reeves (2010). The role of the father in Winnicott’s writings. In Jan Abram 2013. (eds.) Donald Winnicott Today. New York: Routledge. 

žLesley Caldwell (2005). Sex and Sexuality: Winnicottian Perspectives. London: Karnac Books.

žHaydée Faimberg (2014). The paternal function in Winnicott: the psychoanalytical frame. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 95(4):629-640

[11/28]

žSlochower, J. (2011). Analytic idealizations and the disavowed: Winnicott, his Patients, and us. Psychoanal. Dial., 21(1):3-21

žHarry Guntrip (1996). My experience of analysis with Fairbairn and Winnicott. IJPA77:739-754

žMargaret Little (1985). Winnicott working in areas where Psychotic Anxieties predominate. Free Associations, 1(3):9-42

[12/5]

žHaydée Faimberg ([1998]2012). Nachträglichkeit and Winnicott’s ‘Fear of Breakdown.’ In Jan Abram 2013. (eds.) Donald Winnicott Today. New York: Routledge. 

žD.W. Winnicott (1971). Playing: creative activity and the search for the Self. In Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications